CIT Vs. Brahmaputra Capital & Financial Services Ltd (Delhi High Court) The revenue argues that in respect of the three entities, the decision not to reflect revenue recognition, and treat the interest payable as NPA could not be allowed and the ITAT erred in holding that under RBI’s norms, the revenue recognition method adopted was […]
1. Section 35AB(1) : Obtaining of technical knowhow under a license would also amount to acquiring knowhow 2. Section 35AB: Making of lumpsum payment in 3 installments would not make the payment any less a lumpsum payment 3. Expenditure on knowhow which is used for the purposes of carrying on business would stand covered by Section 35AB of the Act
Interest received from debtors for late payment of sale proceeds partakes the character of sale proceeds, and therefore, assessee was eligible for deduction under section 80-IC in respect of such interest.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow bench recently held that the charitable nature of the activities of a society cannot be suspected as the same was within its objects as given in the bye-laws.
Challenging the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-IX, New Delhi (for short hereinafter called as “the learned CIT (A)’) in Appeal No.119 of 2011-12 dated 13.08.2014, assessee preferred this appeal.
We find that DJ had admitted of issuing bogus bills.But, nowhere he had admitted that he had issued accommodation bills to the assessee. In our opinion, there is subtle but very important difference in issuing bogus bills and issuing accommodation bills to a particular party
Chartered Accountants play a vital role in the financial health of an economy. CAs constitute the first layer of vigil mechanism for corporate, Government Institutions, Banking sector and various other constituents in sustaining financial system so that the financial status of a particular Institution is revealed to the public, investors who invest their hard earn savings.
When the CIT is satisfied with the reasons given by the Assessing Officer, he in not once again give separate reasons or repeat the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer and then give his approval for the same.
ITO Vs Tarun Sales (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that Since no dealer or sub-dealer was appointed either by BSNL or by the assessee, for the purpose of marketing the products and/or service of the BSNL, the entire sales were to customers, either directly or through shopkeepers, who rendered services to the customers. The entire sales […]
That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition made by the Aa in treating the income of Rs. 12,00,000/- received towards service charges under the head ‘income from house property
