ACIT Vs Ms. Indus Valley Housing, (ITAT Chennai) The question arises for consideration is whether the investment made by the assessee in the land at Nolambur is a stock-intrade or capital asset? If the land is stock-in-trade, then naturally the profit on sale has to be considered as income from business. If it is considered as capital asset, […]
Notification No. 10/2018-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) In pursuance of notification No. 60/2015-Customs (N.T.), published vide number G.S.R. 453(E), dated 4th June 2015 in Gazette of India, Extra-ordinary, Part-II, section 3, sub-section (i), and as amended by notification No. 133/2015-Customs (N.T.), published vide number G.S.R. 916(E) dated 30th November 2015 in Gazette of India
Where assessee was unable to file Tran-1 form within due date owing to technical glitches in GST website and could not avail of Cenvat credit, the assessee was granted liberty to approach to concerned nodal officer who was directed to look into the issue and facilitate the uploading of Form TRAN-1 without reference to any time frame
Ambattur Infra Developers prevail in ITAT Chennai. Payments for leased space and services to be considered under ‘income from business.’
M/s. Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court) Issue- Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has power under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to give directions for fresh enquiry into the aspects of the subject matter of appeal filed before it either suo motu or on any grounds […]
National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs CST (CESTAT Delhi) Services of construction of women hostel for and on behalf of Ministry of Women and Child Development (WCD), Government of India and construction of Civil Services Offices Institute are not commercial in nature. In furtherance of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of […]
M/s. Patanjali Yogpeeth Trust Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Delhi) Now coming to the demand qua the donations received by the appellant under one of its Scheme called Vanprastha Ashram Scheme, it is held that under this scheme the appellant was leasing the accommodation to all those who are interested to visit the appellant premises till their […]
M/s. Mahasemam Trust Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) There is no dispute, that appellants are a Registered Charitable Trust. There is also no allegation that they have been approved to function as a bank or even as a non-banking institution by the R.B.I. This being so, they cannot be termed as a “Banking […]
CIT Vs M/s. Annadan trust (Kerala High Court) The sub-contract of the assessee cannot be considered to be a charitable activity, especially since the supply of food is with the funds of the State Government, received by the assessee as contract amounts. The activity of the assessee confined to such sub-contracts cannot be deemed to be a charitable activity and […]
1.1. Government of India in the Union Budget of 2018-19, made the following announcement: “SEBI will also consider mandating, beginning with large Corporates, to meet about one-fourth of their financing needs from the debt market.” 1.2. A series of steps have been taken, over time, by Government in consultation with Regulators, to develop and deepen the bond market. At the same time, however, concerns have been raised about the ability of banks to finance increasing borrowing needs of the corporates, especially as the investment cycle has shown an upward tick. Accordingly, the said budget announcement may be seen as a step in the direction of the larger goal of not only to reduce reliance on banks to finance corporates but also to develop a liquid and vibrant corporate bond market.
