1.1. Government of India in the Union Budget of 2018-19, made the following announcement: “SEBI will also consider mandating, beginning with large Corporates, to meet about one-fourth of their financing needs from the debt market.” 1.2. A series of steps have been taken, over time, by Government in consultation with Regulators, to develop and deepen the bond market. At the same time, however, concerns have been raised about the ability of banks to finance increasing borrowing needs of the corporates, especially as the investment cycle has shown an upward tick. Accordingly, the said budget announcement may be seen as a step in the direction of the larger goal of not only to reduce reliance on banks to finance corporates but also to develop a liquid and vibrant corporate bond market.
Where application for registration under section 12A of Income Tax Act, 1961 is not disposed of by either accepting or refusing it within six months as per provisions of section 12AA(2), the registration would be deemed to applicable from date of expiry of six months from date of application.
Century Seeds Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) With reference to the finding of the Ld. CIT that the Form 3CM and 3CL are not filed which are mandatory, it was the submission that assessee has filed Form 3CM in letter format issued by DSIR granting renewal of recognition up to 3 1.03.2015 by the […]
As far as the deduction u/s. 54F of the Act on the question whether if under a JDA multiple flats are given to the owner whether deduction u/s.54F of the Act can be given, the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka and the other decision cited before us supports the plea of the […]
DCIT Vs Aurobindo Pharma Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) We have considered the rival contentions and perused the case law placed on record. In the decision of Concept Pharmaceuticals Ltd (supra) the Coordinate Bench did not allow the expenditure spent outside the R & D unit but the Bench has not considered the explanation introduced with reference to ‘Clinical Trials’. […]
M/s. Royal Challenger Sports Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT Assessee challenges the addition on account of contribution made to Cricket Academy of Rs.45 lakhs holding it to be capital expenditure. The assessee made a contribution of Rs.45 lakhs to Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) for the purpose of creating a cricket academy. The assessee was also a Franchisee of BCCI-IPL, which […]
DCIT Vs M/s. Teleradiology Solutions P. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore) The learned Counsel for the assessee has contended that it is a business arrangement between the assessee and the consultants/doctors. If the assessee does not pay the licence fee on behalf of the doctors, he has to compensate the doctors by making additional payment for the services. […]
The house which is not having any actual rental income but self occupied by assessee should be determined as per the municipal ratable value. Accordingly, the matter is restored to file of the Assessing Officer to find out the municipal ratable value of the house for computing income u/s 22 of the I.T. Act. We direct accordingly.
United Spirits Limited Vs CIT (Calcutta High Court) The assessee contends that it was merely in possession of the premises. Litigation was continuing in this Court. They were allowed to retain possession of the premises, by the Court, on payment of occupation charges of Rs. 32,000/- per month. They say that they were not the […]
In re Susheela Agrovet (GST AAR Telangana) chicken intestine waste is classifiable under heading 0505 of the Customs Tariff heading as the said heading covers “Skins and other parts of birds, with their feathers or down, feathers and parts of feathers (whether or not with trimmed edges) and down, not further worked than cleaned, disinfected […]
