Kerala State has decided to develop the back end modules for the GST at their end. The development of the state GST backend software was entrusted with National Informatics Centre, Govt of India with the support of development team.
At the same time, we cannot also ignore the fact that it was for the Revenue to have allowed smooth switchover from manual to e-filing system of filing TDS returns. The onus and burden was on revenue to provide necessary infrastructure so that tax-payer did not face any inconvenience in filing e-TDS returns.
In re Wonderfrutz Products LLP (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether Tutti-fruity be classified under HSN 08111010 or 20060000? Tutti-fruity is a colourful confectionery containing various chopped and usually candied fruits, or an artificially created flavouring simulating the combined flavour of many different fruits. It is often used in making tutti-fruity ice cream, bakery and confectionery. In […]
Sushmita Sen recent appeal: Where the assessee made certain claim which had not been accepted by the Revenue, penalty under section 271(1)(c) thereon deleted
Smt. Mandalika Sakunthala Vs M/s Fabindia Overseas Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The company reduced his base prices and the profit margins to maintain the same MRP inspite of the increase in the tax rate. In another product, reduction in the base prices found to be more than the additional ITC eligible thereon. Respondent has […]
Non-disposal of an application for registration, by granting or refusing registration, before the expiry of six months as provided under section 12AA(2) would not result in deemed grant of registration,
Jurisdiction to commence proceedings against the director of a delinquent company for recovery of tax dues of delinquent company would require the notice to director/former directors, itself indicating what steps had been taken to recover the dues from delinquent company and failure thereof.
Notification No. 24/2018-Customs (N.T./CAAIDRI) Director General, Revenue Intelligence, hereby appoints officer mentioned in column (5) of the Table below to act as a common adjudicating authority to exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on officer mentioned in column (4) of the said Table in respect of noticees mentioned in column (2) of the said Table for the purpose of adjudication of show cause notice mentioned in column (3) of the said Table, namely:-
Sk. Tamisuddin Vs. Joy Joseph Creado & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) A complaint filed by the power of attorney would be maintainable in law. If that is so, the initial complaint filed by the appellant on behalf of Sairabee as the complainant would not be invalid in law as held by the High Court […]
Lakshman M. Charanjiva Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Indexation benefit against the cost of acquisition shall be available to the assessee on the basis of index of the year in which the payments were actually made by the assessee. The payment made up-to the date of agreement i.e. 18/10/2007 shall be indexed by applying the index […]
