ITAT Mumbai held that amount under the head ‘capital gain’ not taxable as there is no transfer of any right, title, or interest in the property.
CESTAT Kolkata held that for the purpose of sub heading 27101920, the “light oils and preparations” are those of which 90% or more by volume (including losses) distil at 210 degree Celsius. Goods not meeting the requirements as specified under Chapter Note 4 of Chapter 27 cannot be classified under CTH 27101920.
ITAT Delhi held that as per provisions of section 44 of the Income Tax Act there is no requirement of head wise bifurcation while computing income u/s 44 in case of insurance company. Thus, provisions of section 14A are not relevant to make a disallowance.
ITAT Mumbai held that employee’s contribution paid on day next to the due date and due date being a national holiday. Matter remanded back to AO for examining the payments made and allowing the deduction u/s 36(1)(va).
ITAT Amritsar held that a reasonable opportunity should be given to the assessee before making addition u/s 40A(7) of the Income Tax Act before processing rectification application u/s 154.
CESTAT Chennai held that service tax could not be levied on ‘delayed payment charges’ collected by the appellant from their customers from 01.07.2012 also.
Madras High Court directed provisional release of goods on the payment of enhanced customs duty. Further, directed that prayer for waiver of demurrage be addressed to appropriate respondent.
ITAT Delhi held that the revenue itself is not very sure of the receipt of the cash nor there was any evidence. Accordingly, addition based on baseless allegation which cannot be proved is unsustainable.
ITAT Pune held that the deduction u/s 36(1)(va) in respect of employee’s contribution not entitled on failure to deposit employee’s contribution before due date prescribed under the relevant statutes.
ITAT Surat held that assessee is not required to get his books of accounts audited under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act as capital gain, short term or long term, doesn’t form part of turnover. Accordingly, penalty under section 271B not leviable.
