Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Radheyshyam Bisani Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Radheyshyam Bisani Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)

ITAT Surat held that assessee is not required to get his books of accounts audited under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act as capital gain, short term or long term, doesn’t form part of turnover. Accordingly, penalty under section 271B not leviable.

Facts- The assessee is an individual and while return of income has income from salary, house property and capital gain. The Assessing Officer while passing the assessment order, accept

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031