ITAT Mumbai has directed AO to obtain the complete information and examine whether assessee has only leasehold right or complete rights over the property so that provisions of section 50C of the Income Tax Act are attracted.
Gujarat High Court directed the petitioner to furnish their reply as second show cause notice already issued by the department containing the reasons for cancellation of GST registration.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that trade discount is not includible in the assessable value hence central excise duty is not payable on the same.
ITAT Delhi held that payment of self-assessment tax is an existing liability u/s 132B for adjustment of seized cash. Accordingly, interest u/s 234B of the Income Tax Act not leviable.
ITAT Mumbai held that issuance of notice for re-opening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act against the deceased assessee is null in the eyes of law.
CESTAT Chennai held that collection of CVD on basis of retail sale price in terms of Notification No. 49/2008-C.E.(N.T.) dated 24.12.2008 issued under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in case of prepared glues and other prepared adhesives justified.
ITAT Mumbai held that the provisions of Sec. 56(2)(x) of the Act are incorporated in the Finance Act 2017 with the prospective applicability from A.Y.2017-18 and the transactions entered into prior to 1.04.2017 would not suffer any implications of the section.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that post amendment to section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, as introduced vide Finance (No.2) Act, disallowance on account of non-deduction of TDS is restriction to 30% of the expenditure as against 100%.
CESTAT Kolkata held that the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in subsequent show cause notice, where the Department has earlier issued Show Cause Notice in respect of the same subject-matter.
CESTAT Kolkata held that as per substituted provisions of Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, interest is not leviable where wrongly availed credit is only taken but not utilized.
