Madras High Court held that grant-in-aid/ subsidy received from the Government under a rehabilitation scheme is capital receipt and cannot be treated as revenue receipt. Accordingly, question of law is answered in favour of appellant.
Calcutta High Court held that present writ petition filed by personal guarantor is not maintainable since the proceeding u/s. 95 of the IBC is pending before Adjudicating Authority and petition is filed without taking appropriate steps before appropriate forum.
Gujarat High Court held that the services received in respect of setting up the captive wind mill plant are eligible for the Cenvat Credit under rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed.
Telangana High Court held that initiation of proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act after 01.04.2021 without following provisions of section 144B i.e. assessment being carried out in faceless manner is not justifiable. Accordingly, orders are quashed and appeals are allowed.
ITAT Hyderabad held that trade advance given to goldsmith for making gold jewellery and excess amount paid has been received back in cash. The same cannot be added under section 68 of the Income Tax Act as unexplained cash credit. Accordingly, addition u/s. 68 is directed to be deleted.
Patna High Court held that ITAT was not justified in reversing the order of CIT(A) without demonstrating any perversity, misreading of evidence, or application of an incorrect legal standard by the appellate authority. Accordingly, deletion of addition u/s. 68 by CIT(A) justified and writ allowed.
Kerala High Court held that the omission of sub-clause (j) to Section 66D of the Finance Act and, resultantly, imposition of service tax on ‘access to amusement facilities’ is unconstitutional. Accordingly, order set aside and appeal allowed.
Delhi High Court held that in cases involving multiple parties, the adjudication cannot be done by different Commissionerates, the Adjudicating Authority is fixed on the basis of the jurisdiction which has the highest amount of demand tax.
Karnataka High Court held that clubbing / consolidation / bunching/ combining of multiple tax periods/financial years in a Solitary/Single/Composite Show cause notice issued under Section 73 / 74 of the CGST / KGST Act is illegal, invalid, impermissible and without jurisdiction or authority of law.
Uttarakhand High Court held that order of the Competent Authority granting sanction or approval or refusing to grant sanction or approval u/s 151 of the Income Tax Act of 1961 is neither a revisable order, nor an appealable order.
