Delhi High Court held that addition of unsecured loans under section 68 of the Income Tax Act rightly deleted since the said amount is already disclosed before Income Tax Settlement Commission. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Jaipur held that denial to allow the business loss stating the requirement of books of accounts to be audited is not justifiable since turnover during relevant period didn’t exceed the prescribed limit for getting books of accounts audited.
ITAT Chennai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act rightly deleted by CIT(A) since cash deposit during demonetization duly reflected as cash sales and there was no abnormal spike in sales during demonetization.
ITAT Delhi held that comparable controlled transaction cannot be taken as comparable to benchmark the international transaction. Accordingly, transfer pricing adjustment in respect of international transaction towards payment of royalty deleted.
ITAT Indore held that activity of providing hostel/mess is part of main activity of imparting education. Hence, claim of 15% of gross receipts as eligible exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act justified.
CESTAT Chennai held that Enriched Omega 3 Fatty Acid (Fish Oil – Ethyl Ester) and Enriched Omega 3 Fatty Acid-Powder (Fish Oil – Ethyl Ester-Powder) are classifiable under CETH 1516 1000 and not under CETH 3824 9090 as contested by department.
ITAT Mumbai held that National Payments Corporation of India carries out activities which has been recognized as charitable under category of advancement of object for general public utility. Accordingly, revisionary order u/s. 263 quashed as issue already dealt in detail by AO.
Delhi High Court held that non-granting of exemption claimed under section 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act due to delay of 16 days in filing audited report in From 10B not justified since the due to inadvertence error on the part of the auditor / tax professional.
Gujarat High Court held that denial of IGST refund under rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules without considering additional evidences produced by the assessee is not justifiable. Accordingly, matter remanded back to appellate authority for fresh de-novo order.
Madras High Court held that ‘crypto currency’ is a property which is capable of being held in trust. Accordingly, held that applicant is entitled to an interim protection under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
