HC Held that, no GST registration could be suspended or cancelled on basis of Head Office directions without assigning any reason.
HC Held that, rejection of appeal merely because of delay of one day is such a hyper technical and pedantic view of the matter to hold that even the delay of one day would be fatal to the maintainability of the appeal.
HC set aside order confirming excess claim of ITC) passed by Assistant Commissioner (ST) on the ground that the Petitioner was not granted fair opportunity of hearing.
HC held that order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax being ex-parte and in violation of principle of natural justice is liable to be quashed. Further, the High Court remanded back the matter to the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax to decide the case on merits and on the principles of natural justice.
ITAT held that expenses incurred for pre- operative nature cannot be set-off against the interest income. Held that, expenditure incurred by a company during the setting up of new business and its commencement can be allowed as deduction.
HC allowed petition filed by assessee to seek reimbursement of additional tax liability on implementation of GST law for contracts and work orders which had been executed before GST regime.
Calcutta High Court held that Income Tax authorities can initiate afresh proceedings if the previous proceeding were invalid as per law.
CESTAT held that transportation charges collected by way of issuing additional invoice cannot be included in the assessable value of goods for levying excise duty.
ITAT Held that, only 10% of the purchase would be added to the Appellant’s income in case where the Appellant was unable to prove the supplier’s identity. Further remanded back the matter for verification.
HC held that, payment of tax made during the conduct of search cannot be considered as voluntary payment of tax. Further directed the Revenue Department to refund the amount deposited by the assessee along with the interest.
