The judgment by the Gujarat High Court in this case reiterates the principle that parallel investigations on the same subject by different GST authorities can lead to legal complexities. By ordering the transfer of documents to a single investigating unit, the court ensures a streamlined process, emphasizing the need for coherence in legal proceedings.
Rajasthan AAR rules on Input Tax Credit eligibility for GST paid on inward supply of structural support for machinery. Discover key takeaways and the impact on businesses.
Analysis of Orissa High Court’s directive regarding non-constitution of GSTAT and the tax demand timeframe in Krushna Mohan Dutta Vs Commissioner of CT & GST.
Analysis of B.L. Pahariya Medical Store Vs State of U.P.: Allahabad High Court emphasizes the importance of personal hearing before passing adverse orders.
Analysis of Dharampal Satyapal Limited’s case against the GST Council’s decision to change the classification and GST rate of coated illaichi.
Orissa High Court supports pre-deposit in GST appeal through the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL). Insight into Kiran Motors Vs Addl. Commissioner of CT & GST.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Akshar Travels v. C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman exempts school children transportation from service tax, citing educational body exclusion.
CESTAT, Chennai rules gaming laptops as Automatic Data Processing Machines and not Video Game Consoles. Dive into the case’s details and the landmark decision.
High Court and held that the position in law was that the debt ‘due and payable’, when falls within the four corners of clause (a) to Section 530(1) of the Companies Act, would be treated as preferential payment, but it would not override and be given preference over the payments of overriding preferential creditors covered under Section 529A of the Companies Act.
Exploring the case of Karmaxx Infotech vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) in the Madras High Court about GST registration cancellation and legal compliance.
