High Court of Andhra Pradesh confirms the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the APGST and CGST Act, 2017, regarding Input Tax Credit. Learn about the court’s rulings on key questions.
Supreme Court in Paschimachal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited v. Raman Ispat Private Limited held that Section 238 of IBC overrides provisions of Electricity Act, 2003.
The Jharkhand High Court heard a petition seeking the quashing of a First Information Report (FIR) and the entire criminal proceeding against Mr. Anupam Kumar Pathak, proprietor of M/S Maa Mahamaya Enterprises, in connection with a case of Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion.
CESTAT set aside demand of service tax on amount received from NHAI on the ground that same is taxable under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) and held that assessee was not rendering BAS services as alleged.
AAR ruled that ‘Kandi Ravo’ the unmanufactured tobacco, made by crushing tobacco refuse and mixing it with natural clay & water is appropriately classifiable under tariff entry 24013000 and the assessee is liable to pay 28% GST on supply of such goods.
AAR ruled that ITC is admissible for goods purchased from outsourced vendors when consideration is settled through book adjustment, subject to conditions outlined in Sections 16, 17 and 18 of CGST Act and their corresponding rules.
Kerala High Court in Dhanya Sreekumari v. State Tax Officer held that cash not being a stock-in-trade of assessee, was not a thing that ought to have been seized and directed Revenue Department to release cash seized to assessee.
HC held that amount collected without authority of law at the time of search should be refunded along with the interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filling this petition, within 30 days after the receipt of certified copy of order.
HC held that Performance linked bonus (PLB) and Computer reservation service (CRS) fees received by airline agents are not subject to service tax under the category of ‘Business Auxiliary Services’ (BAS).
CESTAT held that assessee had not suppressed any facts and thus, extended period of limitation cannot be invoked and willful suppression of facts is essential to invoke the extended period of limitation
