Rama Shanker Modi Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) Appellant Authority cannot reject appeal merely on the ground that order copy was not furnished physically The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Rama Shanker Modi v the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Services tax and Central Excise [WPA 15639 of 2023 dated July 20, 2023] set […]
Explore the analysis of the case Satya Megha Ispat Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise by CESTAT Kolkata regarding inclusion of transportation charges in assessable value. Understand the implications of FOR contracts and recent CBEC circulars.
CESTAT set aside impugned order and held that the assessee is not receiving penal interest and bouncing charges as a consideration for tolerating an act. Thus, service tax cannot be demanded.
Analysis of the CESTAT Kolkata case involving excise duty demand based on differences between balance sheet and ER-1 returns, highlighting the need for substantial evidence.
The Gujarat High Court rules on appeal timing related to GSTN, stating that failure to upload the order copy cannot prevent a time-barred appeal.
An analysis of Gujarat High Court’s ruling on the assessee’s entitlement to interest for delayed refund by the Revenue Department under the CGST Act.
Insights into the Supreme Court ruling on imposition of interest and penalty on customs duty, CVD, in Union of India & Ors. vs Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.
Explore the recent Bombay High Court judgment in M/s. Wallem Shipmanagement (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. The Union of India & Ors, highlighting the significance of fair opportunities and adherence to natural justice in the rejection of GST refund applications. Understand the implications for businesses facing Show Cause Notices during the pandemic and the court’s commitment to ensuring a just and reasonable process. Stay informed about the legal principles governing such cases.
Delhi HC in v Shivbhola Filaments Private Limited. v. Assistant Commissioner of CGST restored refund application rejected by Adjudicating Authority and held that assessee would not be left unheard.
CESTAT Chennai ruled no service tax is leviable on ABC Consultants Pvt. Ltd. for reimbursement of advertisement charges following precedent.
