Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramgopal Varma Ramaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Ramgopal Varma Ramaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Assessee, a non-resident, did not file a return believing no income was taxable in India. The AO issued notice u/s 148 and later passed a Draft Assessment Order u/s 144C(1) on 14.02.2024 proposing additions. The assessee filed objections before the DRP on 14.03.2024 within the statutory 30 days, triggering the mandatory DRP procedure. However, without waiting for DRP directions, the AO went ahead and passed the Final Assessment Order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 on 03.04.2024, which is a clear violation of Section 144C(5) & (13). When the DRP received ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031