Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramgopal Varma Ramaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramgopal Varma Ramaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Assessee, a non-resident, did not file a return believing no income was taxable in India. The AO issued notice u/s 148 and later passed a Draft Assessment Order u/s 144C(1) on 14.02.2024 proposing additions. The assessee filed objections before the DRP on 14.03.2024 within the statutory 30 days, triggering the mandatory DRP procedure. However, without waiting for DRP directions, the AO went ahead and passed the Final Assessment Order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 on 03.04.2024, which is a clear violation of Section 144C(5) & (13). When the DRP received ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930