Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tirupati Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Tirupati Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Redemption fine u/s 125 and penalty u/s 114 was leviable on exported goods misdeclared as “Natural Abrasive Grain” instead of restricted “Natural Garnet” Conclusion: Since assessee had misdeclared restricted goods as general abrasives to circumvent export restrictions under DGFT policy and therefore assessee was liable for redemption fine of Rs. 10,00,000 under Section 125 and the penalty of Rs. 42,00,000 under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. Held: Assessee had exported goods described as “Natural Abrasive ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031