Saksham Srivastava
Introduction
According to scholars, access to justice means an individual’s ability to know, assert and claim their legal rights in practice. Its essence is to ensure the equitable accessibility of judicial system for the entire people thereby establishing fair and calculated way of dispensing legal issues. Such is the importance of this to a just society, and so it has contributed to the protection of individual rights, and social justice, maintaining the rule of law, peaceful conflict resolution and equitable social participation. The major obstacles to access are lack of awareness of legal rights, restricted access to information and assistance, cumbersome procedures and discriminatory treatment. Removing these hurdles is a key legal aid function, which is why legal aid exists to provide free or low cost services when you can’t afford it, to overcome these hurdles and ensure that this justice is available to everyone no matter their socioeconomic status.
Page Contents
Challenges faced in the past to access Law
The challenges in traditional legal aid systems, as discussed in “The Role of Technology in Access to Justice: The following include “Legal Aid in the Digital Age:
1. Limited Resources, Capacity
– Underfunding: But legal aid organizations can operate with limited budgets that restrict the amount of cases they will take on, and the level of service they are able to provide.
– Staff Shortages: The lack of trained legal people means that many individuals needing assistance lack timely and adequate assistance.
2. Geographical Barriers
-Rural or remote areas have great difficulty in reaching legal aid offices concentrated in urban centres.
-All of this makes it impractical for people to travel and line up for in-person
3. Lengthy Processes
– Traditional systems are usually bureaucratic, often necessitating multiple in person visits, lots of paperwork and long waiting periods, which deters people from asking for help.
– This can lead to delays in over loaded systems further making it hard on the people worried about justice.
4. Awareness and Outreach
-Many people, particularly marginalized people, do not know their rights, or know of existent legal aid services.
-Too often is outreach effort missing from the most
5. Cultural and Linguistic Challenges
-However, traditional legal aid may not be culturally sensitive nor have the appropriate tools of support that other indigenous, immigrants and refugees need.
But legal aid providers and clients can communicate poorly because of language barriers.
Ways to overcome those difficulties
1. Enhancing Access
-Overcoming Geographic Barriers: Legal aid becomes accessible online, via virtual consultations, by means of mobile apps in those who live in rural, remote zones.
– 24/7 Availability: Chatbots and online legal resource are digital tools that facilitate users to get help exposed to the shackles of traditional office hours.
2. Resource Allocation Improving
– Automation: AI driven tools can take the duller parts, like document preparation or case triage, and automate them, so resources can instead be devoted to more demanding
– Scalability: Large numbers of users can be served online simultaneously, without increasing costs in proportion.
3. Cost Efficiency
-Reduced Operational Costs: Especially for legal aid organizations, digital platforms cut overhead expenses that would otherwise serve as a barrier to providing direct client services, allowing their scarce resources to be directed to exacting client services.
– Affordable Alternatives: Basic legal needs have low cost tools like self help legal websites and document automation software.
4. Increasing Awareness
– Online Campaigns: Across social media, targeted ads, and websites, awareness of legal rights and existent resources can be raised for targeted groups in unique ways.
-Accessible Information: With technology there are multilingual and multimedia records of rights that educate people about their rights and how to navigate legal systems.
5. Cultural and Linguistic Barriers
– Translation and Localization: AI based legal translate tools can translate legal documents into other languages and provides services in various languages.
– Cultural Sensitivity: With the right tailored online platform, the particular needs of marginalized communities can be better squared: culturally appropriate legal advice, for example.
Key components to access justice
1. Availability
-Definition: Having access to the legal resources (collective), services and institutions (regarding legal supplies, channels, coercive measures, and more) that are available to all population, including marginalized and underserved population.
– Significance: Physical legal aid offices must be within reach for those in just as the digital platforms offering their services must be.
2. Affordability
– Definition: Reasonable price or no price for those who have no means of paying should be offered to provide services to those who are denied access to justice because of inability to pay.
– Significance: Other things like legal aid programs, or technology driven solutions for that matter, are necessary to keep the affordability gap at bay.
3. Efficiency
– Definition: It should also be timely, streamlined with little or no undue delay or
– Significance: Efficient systems means less emotional and financial cost of individuals and increases the trust of the justice system.
4. Equity
– Definition: Justice must not be delivered without discrimination, impartially, and on a need
– Significance: Systemic inequality is perpetuated and that amounts to injustice.
5. Transparency
– Definition: Legal processes should be open and understandable by all in a way that makes it possible for users to follow their cases and trust the results.
– Significance: In transparent systems, fairness and accountability of the justice system is
Objective of the Study
1. It attempts to seek ways in which the technological development can facilitate better accessibility to justice by enhancing how legal aid products and services are provided.
2. As a first step in identifying these service improvement opportunities, we seek to identify how technology could in turn address barriers such as affordability, accessibility or efficiency in legal aid.
3. The approaches this thesis takes to analyze the challenges of the digital divide; data privacy and security concerns, algorithmic bias, and ethical dilemmas when integrating technology into legal aid.
4. Use of existing digital legal aid initiatives to evaluate their effectiveness in serving diverse populations as well as their raw data to obtain insights on diversity and needs in the various populations they serve.
5. This thesis will propose innovative and sustainable ideas for overcoming current digital legal aid system design barriers.
6. To make recommendations for equitable use of technology to support the provision of legal aid for the vulnerable and marginalized for the fair administration of justice.
7. An evaluation of how technology plays a part in the means to maintain empathy, human connection, and ethical standards as they relate to the provision of legal aid.
Case studies of virtual courts during the COVID-19 pandemic of law
There are a bunch of apps and websites that provide simplified legal information and help explain people’s rights and how to handle legal issues. Here are a few examples:
* LegalZoom: Among its services, this website offers a great variety ranging from document preparation to legal advice and legal professionals availability. They also have articles, guides and videos of a wealth of free legal information and resources.
*Rocket Lawyer: Like LegalZoom, Rocket Lawyer offers a number of legal services including document creation, legal advice and an access to an attorney network. On top, they have a big library of free legal resources and tools.
*Nolo: They specialize in providing self help legal resources (books, software, online tools) on this website. They have a wide variety of topics which cover business law, family law and much more.
*LawDepot: It is a website to access to legal documents and forms, legal information and advice. On top of this, they also have a subscription that gives you access to their entire library of documents and documents.
*Justia: That is being covered by this website by providing a complete bundle of legal resources including case law, statutes, legal forms, legal news, etc. They also offer legal information and advice to a number of different topics.
There are just a few of the many apps and websites that can supply the simplified legal information. These resources are not a substitute for professional legal advice; it is important that you remember that. If a particular issue or question pertaining to legalities, get in contact with an attorney.
Challenges in Digital Legal Aid
Transformative opportunities are offered by digital legal aid, however, it is hampered by a number of challenges to equitable implementation. While we have addressed a lot of this divide, there is still a strong disconnect due to the digital divide, refusing to include the most vulnerable of our population – those with no reliable internet, no affordable devices, and no digital literacy skills – requiring increased efforts in bridging this gap. However, in digital platforms capable of handling sensitive legal information, data privacy and security must be paramount too, since they depend on a strong encryption, secure authentication and regular updates to guarantee confidentiality of their clients. In addition, accessibility and usability pose the problem of integration and usability feature for the disability people and design human friendly for those who used not familiar with technology. Algorithmic bias in AI powered tools exposes a realm of possibility where the individual providing the legal advice could lose their freedom of action by having their decision rendered biased by an algorithmic tool. It also brings into question moral and interpersonal questions: Do not disclose a client’s details to the government being an ethical problem at first; supervising the technology used and the integrity of the legal process being another such concern.
Technology might make us more efficient but we cannot forget how to connect with humans and this is important for complete empathetic and personalized support to our clients with complex needs. Finally funding and sustainability are imperative, there are big upfront costs for building and maintaining efficient digital legal aid platforms and long-term operational thinking is a must. To fully realise the digital legal aid’s full potential, as well as its accessibility and reliability, these challenges must be addressed.
CASE LAWS
While specific case laws directly addressing “The Role of Technology in Access to Justice: Though the title of ‘Legal Aid in the Digital Age’ may be more structure, several landmark cases have addressed the interrelationships of technology and legal proceedings, at the very least in relation to access and fairness.
*Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. The State of West Bengal & Ors. (1981): In this case, it was highlighted the fact that no time can be wasted in passing a judgement and at the same time it was mentioned that the whole court procedure must be efficient. While not strictly about technology, it’s the start of modernizing court systems which technology now makes possible.
*State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan Vaidya (1991): The problem here was of delayed justice, and the need of expediting judicial process. But technology can help enormously — through e-filing, case tracking, and online scheduling — with efficient case management and disposal, which it underscored.
*Common Cause v. Union of India (1999): The judicial reforms included the need for transparency and accountability in the judiciary; case was on judicial reforms. Indirectly it also supports the use of technology to improve transparency and public access to judicial content material data.
*Supreme Court of India’s initiatives during the COVID-19 pandemic: For virtual hearings, the Supreme Court’s immediate embrace while the pandemic raged was not a single case, but it did demonstrate the promise of technology to simplify access to justice. By doing so, it made it possible for litigants in far off (or physically impaired) areas to continue to have their basic judicial functions.
Although not in themselves dealing with digital legal aid, they serve to highlight the broader principles of access to justice, efficiency and fairness that form the backdrop of the debate about how technology can aid in the delivery of legal aid.
In addition it should also talk about international legal framework and the best practices on the use of technology in Legal Aid. As an example, the Basic Principles of the United Nations on the Role of Lawyers (Basic Principles) underline the necessity to give lawyers the means to obtain information and technology to be able to work for their clients effectively.
Through case analysis and international reference, we can come to a more full and
encompassed perspective of the legal and ethical contexts of technology adoption within the legal aid arena to ensure that in reality this ends in improving access to justice for all.
SOURCES OF RESEARCH
Books
Access to Justice and Legal Aid: Comparative Perspectives on Unmet Legal Need Hardcover – 26 January 2017
Law and Technology by Niharika Vij (Author) second edition
Websites
https://www.manupatrafast.com/ https://legalserviceindia.com/
https://www.aequivic.in/
*****
Authors: Saksham Srivastava, Priyanshu Bansal and Palak Singh
Institution: Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University
Bio: Law students with a keen interest in legal reforms, digital innovation, and public policy.
