Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Kerala AAR Clarifies GST on fees collected by Directorate of Medical Education 

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 5643
Case Name
In re Directorate of Medical Education (GST AAR Kerala)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

In re Directorate of Medical Education (GST AAR Kerala)

Goods and Services Tax (GST) Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Kerala has provided clarity on the applicability of GST to fees collected by the Directorate of Medical Education (DME), Government of Kerala. The ruling distinguishes between fees levied on medical staff for leave without allowance (LWA) and inspection fees collected from self-financing educational institutions, declaring the former exempt from GST and the latter taxable at 18%.

The DME sought an advance ruling on two specific issues. First, the taxability of fees collected from medical officers, nursing, and paramedical staff wishing to avail leave without allowance for private employment. The Kerala Government had introduced these fees (e.g., Rs. 50,000 for Assistant Professors and above, Rs. 15,000 for Lecturers & Non-teaching staff) to restrict LWA due to acute staff shortages. The AAR, referencing CBIC Circular No. 178/10/2022-GST dated 03.08.2022, ruled that such fees are not subject to GST. The circular clarifies that amounts recovered as penalties, such as forfeiture of salary or bond amounts for premature exit, are not consideration for tolerating an act. The AAR reasoned that the LWA fee is a deterrent, a policy penalty aimed at discouraging indiscriminate leave and safeguarding public interest, not a charge for a service rendered to the employee. It does not confer any new right or benefit. Furthermore, the DME, as a government department, is not engaged in a business activity while levying this fee, and the employee is acting in a personal employment context. The AAR also noted the decision in M/s Manappuram Finance Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner, Central Tax and Excise, Thrissur (2022), which upheld that notice pay recoveries are not a supply under GST. Thus, the AAR concluded that these LWA fees do not constitute a “supply” under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, and no GST is leviable.

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 20,886

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.