This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CENVAT Credit availed on trading activity is not admissible
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dorma India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Dorma India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai held that cenvat credit availed on trading activity is not admissible, accordingly, cenvat credit admissible on common input services needs to be reversed by invoking the extended period of limitation.
Facts-
The appellant is engaged in manufacture of “Automatic Door Operators and Door Closures” and parts falling under Chapter Sub-heading 83 of CETA, 1985. The appellant was also engaged in trading activity of imported as well as locally procured components and inputs.
...
Author Info
