Case Law Details
Case Name : ICICI Bank Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ICICI Bank Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that mere RBI recognition of debt instrument as additional tier/ capital doesn’t change the nature of perpetual debt instrument. Hence, interest expenses on perpetual bonds, allowable as deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts-
During the course of assessment, the A.O also noticed that assessee has claimed interest expenditure u/s 36(1)(iii)of the Act in respect of perpetual bonds issued by the assessee bank. On query, the assessee explained that these bonds have been issued to various insurance companies,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

