Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ICICI Bank Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ICICI Bank Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that mere RBI recognition of debt instrument as additional tier/ capital doesn’t change the nature of perpetual debt instrument. Hence, interest expenses on perpetual bonds, allowable as deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Facts- During the course of assessment, the A.O also noticed that assessee has claimed interest expenditure u/s 36(1)(iii)of the Act in respect of perpetual bonds issued by the assessee bank. On query, the assessee explained that these bonds have been issued to various insurance companies,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031