Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vijay Dinkar Jadhav (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vijay Dinkar Jadhav (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Conclusion: The claim of assessee of receipt of Rs.41,20,000/- on account of proposed sale of Shop was not genuine as genuineness of a transaction was one of the most important, foundational and critical factors in determining whether explanation given by assessee was acceptable or not, and this genuineness was to be examined in the light of ground realities. When there was no clear documentary evidence to prove the identity of the assessee the burden of proof lies on him claiming the benefit of being the assessee. Held: In the instant case, there ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031