This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
‘Close up’ should be classified as dental cleaner, not toothpaste–SC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner Of Central Excise, Vapi Vs M/s. Global Health Care Products (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
CA Urvashi Porwal
Brief of the case
In the case of Commissioner Of Central Excise, Vapi Vs. M/s. Global Health Care Products , the Supreme Court held that ‘Close up’ should be classified as dental cleaner, not toothpaste on account of different and varing ingredients and ratio of all the inputs which go into the manufacturing of a toothpaste and dental cleaner.
Brief facts of the Case
The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of different brands of toothpaste and these are manufactured exclusively for M/s. Hindustan Lever Limited, Mumbai (for short, ‘HLL’) sin...






that’s what legislation changes over supreme court decision.
Close up whitening dental cleaner was earlier also classified in 3306.90 as per Mumbai tribunal decision in 2005.