Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

‘Close up’ should be classified as dental cleaner, not toothpaste–SC

Case Law Details

Case Name
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Vapi Vs M/s. Global Health Care Products (Supreme Court of India)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement CA Urvashi Porwal Brief of the case In the case of Commissioner Of Central Excise, Vapi Vs. M/s. Global Health Care Products , the Supreme Court held that ‘Close up’ should be classified as dental cleaner, not toothpaste on account of different and varing ingredients and ratio of all the inputs which go into the manufacturing of a toothpaste and dental cleaner. Brief facts of the Case The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of different brands of toothpaste and these are manufactured exclusively for M/s. Hindustan Lever Limited, Mumbai (for short, ‘HLL’) sin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments
  1. Close up whitening dental cleaner was earlier also classified in 3306.90 as per Mumbai tribunal decision in 2005.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *