Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajay Kumar Singh Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajay Kumar Singh Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) Revision under section 263 is not sustainable where the very basis adopted by the PCIT fails, namely, that jewellery expenditure incurred by a company could be taxed as a perquisite in the hands of an individual without establishing an employer-employee relationship. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, allowed the appeal of an assessee against the revisionary order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2019-20. The case arose after a search operation in which jewellery purchase bills amounting to Rs. 31.28 lakh were found at the as...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Notices Quashed as Satisfaction Note Was Recorded Nearly 10 Months Late Bombay HC Dismissed Revenue Appeal as It Did Not Challenge CIT(A)’s Order Employer Not Liable to Refund TDS Due to Non-Filing of Form 10E: Madras HC Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied Solely Due to Belated Form 67: ITAT Kolkata Delay in Filing Form 10B Condoned as Covid-19 Caused Genuine Hardship: Orissa HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031