Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Rajesh Jain (ITAT Dehradun)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Rajesh Jain (ITAT Dehradun) Deduction under section 54B cannot be denied merely because the unutilised amount was not deposited in the Capital Gains Account Scheme, where the assessee has actually invested the sale consideration in purchase of agricultural land within the prescribed two-year period. Issue: Whether exemption under section 54B could be denied solely because the assessee did not deposit the unutilised amount in the Capital Gains Account Scheme (CGAS), despite having invested the sale proceeds in new agricultural land within two years from the date of transfer. Facts: Th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Notices Quashed as Satisfaction Note Was Recorded Nearly 10 Months Late Bombay HC Dismissed Revenue Appeal as It Did Not Challenge CIT(A)’s Order Employer Not Liable to Refund TDS Due to Non-Filing of Form 10E: Madras HC Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied Solely Due to Belated Form 67: ITAT Kolkata Delay in Filing Form 10B Condoned as Covid-19 Caused Genuine Hardship: Orissa HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031