Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Kanchan Markhedkar (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Kanchan Markhedkar (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT upheld deletion of additions exceeding ₹10.57 crore made under section 56(2)(vii)(c), holding that for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17, the Assessing Officer could not adopt a “look-through” approach by valuing underlying subsidiary companies instead of the shares actually purchased by the assessee. The Revenue alleged that the assessee and family members had acquired control of companies having huge share premium and assets through intermediary holding companies at nominal value, thereby indirectly acquiring underlying shares far below fa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031