This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 54F Exemption Allowed as Entire Capital Gain Was Invested Within Statutory Period
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Gurkanwal Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Gurkanwal Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Capital Gains Addition Deleted Because Procedural Lapse Cannot Override Genuine Section 54F Claim; Section 54F Benefit Cannot Be Denied Solely for Non-Deposit in Capital Gain Account Scheme; ITAT Grants Section 54F Relief Because Revenue Could Not Disprove Residential Investment Evidence; Beneficial Provision Under Section 54F Must Be Liberally Interpreted, Rules ITAT.
Summary: The ITAT Chandigarh allowed the assessee’s appeal and held that exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied merely because the unutil...




