Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 54F Exemption Allowed as Entire Capital Gain Was Invested Within Statutory Period

Case Law Details

Case Name
Gurkanwal Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement Gurkanwal Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Capital Gains Addition Deleted Because Procedural Lapse Cannot Override Genuine Section 54F Claim; Section 54F Benefit Cannot Be Denied Solely for Non-Deposit in Capital Gain Account Scheme; ITAT Grants Section 54F Relief Because Revenue Could Not Disprove Residential Investment Evidence; Beneficial Provision Under Section 54F Must Be Liberally Interpreted, Rules ITAT. Summary: The ITAT Chandigarh allowed the assessee’s appeal and held that exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied merely because the unutil...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Ajay Kumar Agrawal
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: AJAY K AGRAWAL AND ASSOCIATES
Location: NEW DELHI, Delhi
Articles Published: 273

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *