Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Smt. Ashu Ashok (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Smt. Ashu Ashok (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Deletes Income Addition Because Section 44AD Did Not Require Detailed Expense Proof;  Jewellery Addition Removed as Prior Disclosure Before Settlement Commission Covered Search Findings;  No Estimated Expense Disallowance Allowed Under Section 44AD;  ITAT Delhi Upholds Deletion of Jewellery Addition Due to Earlier Settlement Disclosure. In DCIT Vs Smt. Ashu Ashok, the ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A) deleting additions made towards undisclosed income and unexplained jewellery for Assessment Year 20...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930