Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Madhu Souharda Pathina Sahakari Niyamitha Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Madhu Souharda Pathina Sahakari Niyamitha Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Miss the Due Date, Miss U/s 80P: No Second Chances-Late Return, No Relief: U/s80P Strictly Time-Barred- Karnataka HC The Karnataka High Court dismissed the assessee’s appeal and upheld denial of deduction under Section 80P where no return of income was filed. The assessee, an AOP, failed to file its return despite notice u/s 142(1), leading to a best judgment assessment u/s 144. It argued that even in such assessment, the AO must grant eligible deductions like Section 80P, & that Section 80A(5) applies only where a r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031