Karnataka High Court

Investigation can be assigned to SFIO during pendency of proceeding u/s. 210 of Companies Act: Karnataka HC

Exalogic Solutions Private Limited Vs Director (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court held that during the pendency of proceedings u/s. 210 of the Companies Act, 2013, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) can be assigned with the investigation, u/s. 212 of the Companies Act....

Section 148A(d) Order Bound by Notice Scope under Section 148A(b)

Vasanthi Ramdas Pai Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)

Explore Karnataka HCs ruling on Section 148A(d) under IT Act in Vasanthi Ramdas Pai Vs ITO. Analysis covers reassessment proceedings, key arguments, and implications....

Holding Shares in a Subsidiary by a Holding Company is not ‘Supply of Service

Yonex India Private Limited Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court clarifies that holding shares in a subsidiary doesn't constitute a 'supply of service' under GST, impacting the Yonex India case....

Offence U/s. 138 of NI Act can not be initiated against wife for cheque issued by Husband: HC

Shashikala Jayaram Vs Appayappa (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court revolved around Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 in case of Shashikala Jayaram vs. Appayappa - can cheque issued by spouse be prosecutable?...

Karnataka HC Directs Govt. to decide on Section 80TTA Limit representation: Deadline Jan 31

Rupesh Srivastava Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court directs the Government to address petitioner's representation on Section 80TTA limit by Jan 31. Analysis of Rupesh Srivastava Vs CBDT case and its impact....

Erroneous Claim without Mens Rea Not Grounds for Section 276 Proceedings under Income Tax

Anurag Bagaria Vs Income Tax Department (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court held that incorrect claim or erroneous claim would not amount to willful evasion. Further, mere fact of not accurate tax, not exact tax or erroneous tax would not lead to the proceedings under Section 276 of the Income Tax Act....

Revenue Department Can’t Block ITC Beyond One Year: Karnataka HC

S.P. Metals Vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court ruling: Revenue cannot block Input Tax Credit (ITC) for more than one year. Details of S.P. Metals vs Asst. Commissioner of Central Tax case....

No Reassessment after 3 Years, Escaped Income below Rs. 50 Lakh: Karnataka HC

Pramila Mahadev Tadkase Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court rules against income tax reassessment after 3 years. Case: Pramila Mahadev Tadkase Vs ITO. Details of the judgment and legal implications....

Income Tax Notice Invalid if not mailed on Registered Email ID: Karnataka HC

Sterling Urban Ventures Private Limited Vs Assessment Unit (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court invalidates income tax assessment order citing incorrect email notices. Details of Sterling Urban Ventures Pvt Ltd Vs Assessment Unit case....

Mere absence of GSTIN should not warrant GST exemption denial: Karnataka HC

Hatsoff Helicopter Training P Limited Vs State Of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court)

Read the Karnataka High Court judgment on Hatsoff Helicopter Training's tax dispute. Exemption granted for non-furnishing GSTIN. Get insights on the case....

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (6,874)
Company Law (10,067)
Corporate Law (13,547)
Custom Duty (10,819)
DGFT (5,156)
Excise Duty (5,616)
Fema / RBI (5,765)
Finance (6,488)
Income Tax (49,819)
SEBI (5,336)
Service Tax (4,889)