Karnataka High Court

Interest on donation with specific direction to form part of corpus of trust will be exempt U/s. 11 d with specific direction o form part of corpus of trust will be exempt U/s. 11

CIT Vs Mata Amrithanandamayi Math (Karala High Court)

CIT Vs Mata Amrithanandamayi Math (Karala High Court) A reading of section 11 shows that subject to the provisions of sections 62 and 63, the incomes enumerated therein shall not be included in the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt of the income. The person in receipt of the income, […]...

Read More

Medical college collection Huge Capitation Fee as Anonymous Donations – HC disallows Tax exemption

M/s Navodaya Education Trust Vs Sri. Sunki Rajender Reddy (Karnataka High Court)

M/s Navodaya Education Trust Vs Sri. Sunki Rajender Reddy (Karnataka High Court) The petitioner – Trust in question having the cloak of an Educational Trust, to enjoy the exemption from Income Tax obtained the approval under Section 10(23-C) of the Act, was thoroughly misused and abused by the Trustees who appear to be Members of [&...

Read More

Govt depts should avoid unnecessary litigation in Constitutional Courts just for the sake of proving their fictional desires: HC

ACIT Vs. Epson India Pvt. Ltd. (Karnataka High Court)

Revenue authorities and other Government Departments should not avail constitutional remedies for not good reasons, waste the public money and time of constitutional court for frivolous writ petitions...

Read More

Sec. 54 Utilization of capital gains in purchase of residential house sufficient to claim

CIT & Anr. Vs. Shkuntla Devi (Karnataka High Court)

Utilization of capital gains in construction /Purchase of residential house would suffice to claim the benefit of section 54 of the Act irrespective of the fact that transaction not being complete in all respects. ...

Read More

GST rate applicable on scrap buses put to auction; HC dismisses petition

M/s. M.J.S. Enterprises & Ors vs. The Controller of Stores & Purchase & Ors. (Karnataka High Court)

M/s. M.J.S. Enterprises & Ors vs. The Controller of Stores & Purchase & Ors. (Karnataka High Court) HC held that it would be premature for the Court to decide such academic questions at this stage, when the very foundation of such a dispute itself is not even available for the Court to decide. It is […]...

Read More

No Interim Relief to Google: HC directs ITAT for expeditious disposal of appeal

Google India Private Limited Vs. DICT (Karnataka High Court)

In the circumstances, a direction is issued to the Tribunal to dispose of the appeal in an expeditious manner i.e., on or before 31/01/2018. It is needless to observe that in view of the specific direction issued by this Court for expeditious disposal of the appeal by the Appellate Tribunal, both parties are directed to co-operate with t...

Read More

HC on allowability of deduction U/s. 10A / 10B on Interest Income

CIT Vs. Hewlett Packard Global Soft Ltd (Karnataka High Court)

CIT Vs. Hewlett Packard Global Soft Ltd (Karnataka High Court) (Full Bench) HC held that assessee was entitled to 100% exemption or deduction under Section 10-A of the Act in respect of the interest income earned by it on the deposits made by it with the Banks in the ordinary course of its business and […]...

Read More

Exemption U/s. 10A / 10B can be claimed on incidental income from export of goods

CIT Vs. Hewlett Packard Global Soft Ltd (Karnataka High Court)

Profits of the business of the Undertaking for the purposes of Section 10-A/ 10-B includes the Profits and Gains from export of the articles as well as all other incidental incomes...

Read More

CA can be tried under Prevention of Corruption Act for offering bribe to ITO

H. Naginchand Kincha Vs. Superintendent of Police (Karnataka High Court)

CA accused of offering a bribe to ITO for performing an official act can be tried U/s. 7 and 13 (1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and section 120-B of the IPC. The fact that the CA is not a public servant is irrelevant. ...

Read More

Registry cannot insist on NOC from old advocate to appoint new advocate

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd Vs M.Rajashekar (Karnataka High Court)

There is nothing known as irrevocable vakalatnama. The right of a party to withdraw vakalatnama or authorization given to an advocate is absolute. Hence, a party may discharge his advocate any time, with or without cause by withdrawing his vakalatnama or authorization....

Read More
Page 1 of 2112345...1020...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,603)
Company Law (3,641)
Custom Duty (6,789)
DGFT (3,557)
Excise Duty (4,090)
Fema / RBI (3,355)
Finance (3,592)
Income Tax (26,352)
SEBI (2,799)
Service Tax (3,307)