Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Roopsingh Bhupal Singh (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Roopsingh Bhupal Singh (ITAT Ahmedabad) Addition u/s 69 on Alleged Property Investment Deleted – Difference Between Agreement & Sale Deed Not Sufficient Evidence – ITAT Ahmedabad AO reopened the assessment after noticing that the assessee had entered into an initial sale agreement for purchase of agricultural land at ₹5.22 crore, whereas the final registered sale deed reflected consideration of only ₹25.25 lakh. Treating the difference as unexplained investment,  AO added ₹2.48 crore (assessee’s 50% share) u/s 69, mainly due to non-compliance during assessment proce...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930