Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Roopsingh Bhupal Singh (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
ITO Vs Roopsingh Bhupal Singh (ITAT Ahmedabad) Addition u/s 69 on Alleged Property Investment Deleted – Difference Between Agreement & Sale Deed Not Sufficient Evidence – ITAT Ahmedabad AO reopened the assessment after noticing that the assessee had entered into an initial sale agreement for purchase of agricultural land at ₹5.22 crore, whereas the final registered sale deed reflected consideration of only ₹25.25 lakh. Treating the difference as unexplained investment,  AO added ₹2.48 crore (assessee’s 50% share) u/s 69, mainly due to non-compliance during assessment proce...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031