Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Umarfarooq Athani Vs Income Department (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Umarfarooq Athani Vs Income Department (ITAT Bangalore) Assessment Set Aside Due to Wrong Email Service: ITAT Condones Delay, Admits Additional Evidence and Restores Matter to AO The Bangalore Bench of the ITAT condoned delays of 118 days in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) and 9 days before the Tribunal, holding that the lapses were inadvertent and supported by sufficient cause. The Tribunal also admitted additional evidence under Rule 29, finding it crucial for proper adjudication. On merits, the assessee—an individual trader and commission agent—faced a best judgment assessment whe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930