Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Umarfarooq Athani Vs Income Department (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Umarfarooq Athani Vs Income Department (ITAT Bangalore) Assessment Set Aside Due to Wrong Email Service: ITAT Condones Delay, Admits Additional Evidence and Restores Matter to AO The Bangalore Bench of the ITAT condoned delays of 118 days in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) and 9 days before the Tribunal, holding that the lapses were inadvertent and supported by sufficient cause. The Tribunal also admitted additional evidence under Rule 29, finding it crucial for proper adjudication. On merits, the assessee—an individual trader and commission agent—faced a best judgment assessment whe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930