Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harjeet Kaur Vs Circle (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Harjeet Kaur Vs Circle (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) Cannot Set Aside After Favorable Remand: Delhi ITAT Quashes Section 144 Assessment and Deletes Massive Cash Deposit Additions The Delhi Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of Harjeet Kaur (AY 2017-18) and quashed both the CIT(A)’s set-aside order and the original best-judgment assessment under section 144, holding that once additional evidence is admitted and a detailed remand report is obtained, the CIT(A) is duty-bound to decide the appeal on merits and cannot give a “fresh lease of life” to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal noted that duri...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930