Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harjeet Kaur Vs Circle (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Harjeet Kaur Vs Circle (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) Cannot Set Aside After Favorable Remand: Delhi ITAT Quashes Section 144 Assessment and Deletes Massive Cash Deposit Additions The Delhi Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of Harjeet Kaur (AY 2017-18) and quashed both the CIT(A)’s set-aside order and the original best-judgment assessment under section 144, holding that once additional evidence is admitted and a detailed remand report is obtained, the CIT(A) is duty-bound to decide the appeal on merits and cannot give a “fresh lease of life” to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal noted that duri...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai Ad Hoc Commission Cap Without Comparables Invalid; Section 40A(2)(b) Inapplicable: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031