Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Liz Hemangbhai Bhatt Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Liz Hemangbhai Bhatt Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) Sent Email Notices Despite Assessee Requesting Otherwise—ITAT Restores Appeals with Costs- Assessee’s Non-Cooperation Attracts Cost, But Natural Justice Prevails Ahmedabad Tribunal dealt with four appeals—two quantum & two penalty—arising from ex-parte orders of CIT(A)/NFAC. Assessee showed 30-day delay in filing appeals, explaining that CIT(A) sent hearing notices only by email despite Form 35 specifically requesting non-email communication, resulting in Assessee missing all four hearing dates. Tribunal noted that this was the se...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930