Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maniti Jayesh Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Maniti Jayesh Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Treats Property Gain as LTCG Because Holding Period Counted From Allotment Date;  Section 56(2)(x) Addition Sent Back for Verification Because Allotment Date Could Determine Stamp Duty Value;  Additional Evidence Deemed Admitted Because CIT(A) Considered It While Deciding Appeal; From Related-Party Transaction Without Proof of Sham Arrangement, Says ITAT. The appeal arose from an assessment for AY 2018-19 involving the purchase and subsequent sale of an office premises. The assessee had purchased the property from a developer for ₹71,90,000, wh...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031