The Bangalore ITAT held that once a notice under Section 143(2) initiates regular scrutiny assessment, the Department cannot subsequently resort to summary processing under Section 143(1). The Tribunal quashed massive GST-related adjustments as being without jurisdiction.
The article explains how the Supreme Court evolved curative jurisdiction in exceptional cases to correct grave injustice even after dismissal of review petitions. It highlights the legal framework, safeguards, and landmark rulings shaping curative petitions in India.
The article argues that DGFT’s annual IEC updation forces exporters to repeatedly submit data already available with government databases. It claims the process imposes unnecessary costs and operational hardships without improving compliance.
The article questions why West Uttar Pradesh has been denied a High Court Bench despite contributing the majority of pending cases in Allahabad High Court. It argues that the continued denial violates constitutional equality and burdens litigants with extreme travel hardships.
The Calcutta High Court refused to entertain the writ petition after noting that the GST Appellate Tribunal under Section 112 had been constituted. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal before the Tribunal.
CBIC amended Notification No. 12/97-Customs (N.T.) to include Village Namli, Ratlam as an authorized customs location. The notification permits unloading of imported goods and loading of export goods, expanding customs infrastructure in Madhya Pradesh.
Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to withdraw the writ petition and pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Court directed the appellate authority to consider the delay sympathetically because the taxpayer had earlier approached the High Court.
Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to withdraw the writ petition and pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Court directed the appellate authority to consider the delay sympathetically since the taxpayer had approached the High Court earlier.
High Court held that taxpayers should not be denied an opportunity to seek revocation of cancelled GST registration merely because the online portal does not permit filing after limitation expiry.
Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to withdraw the writ petition and pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Court directed the appellate authority to consider the delay sympathetically because the taxpayer had been pursuing remedy before the High Court.
