Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Krishna Jaiswal Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Calcutta High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Krishna Jaiswal Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Calcutta High Court)

The Calcutta High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an order dated August 26, 2025 passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the State Goods and Services Tax Act and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The State submitted that the petitioner now had an alternative remedy before the Appellate Tribunal constituted under Section 112(1) of the CGST Act. The Court noted that when the writ petition was filed, the Appellate Tribunal had not yet been constituted.

The Court further noted that the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance issued a notification dated September 17, 2025 specifying June 30, 2026 as the last date for filing appeals before the Appellate Tribunal in cases where the impugned order had been communicated before April 1, 2026. For orders communicated on or after April 1, 2026, appeals could be filed within three months from communication of the order.

In view of the notification and availability of the alternative appellate remedy, the Court declined to entertain the writ petition and granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

Petitioner Represented by Mr. Abhijat Das, Ms. Aratrika Roy and Mr. Anirban Chatterjee.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated August 26, 2025, passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the State Goods and Services Tax Act and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the petitioner now has an alternative remedy before the Appellate Tribunal constituted under Section 112(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It appears that, at the time of filing of the writ petition, the Appellate Tribunal under Section 112(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 had not been constituted. It further appears that a notification dated September 17, 2025 has since been issued by the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, which reads as follows:-

“S.O. 4220(E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies the 30th day of June, 2026, as the date upto which appeal may be filed before the Appellate Tribunal under this Act in respect of all cases where the order sought to be appealed against is communicated to the person preferring the appeal before the 1st day of April, 2026 and all appeals in respect of order communicated on or after 1st April, 2026 may be filed before the Appellate Tribunal within three months from the date on which such order is communicated to the person preferring the appeal.”

In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to entertain

the present writ petition.

Accordingly, WPA 27555 of 2025 is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal in terms of the aforesaid notification dated September 17, 2025 before the Appellate Tribunal.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031