ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act treating share application money from undisclosed source unsustainable as burden duly discharged by filing confirmation, affidavit, copy of income tax return and bank statement of respective parties.
Uttarakhand High Court held that issuance of notice to the Transferor Company (i.e. non-existent entity) and order passed u/s 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act against the non-existent entity is bad in law and liable to be quashed.
CESTAT Delhi held that as per rule 4(b)(iii) of the point of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011, in case payment is received before change in effective rate of tax and invoice is issued after change in effective rate of tax, then, point of taxation will be date of payment. Hence, demand set aside on advance receipt.
In case of Prtatap Singh Yadav Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) assessment order was declared invalid due to non-compliance with CBDT Circular No.19/2019.
Read detailed analysis of the case Practo Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) where ITAT declared DRP directions invalid due to missing DIN.
RBI decided to extend Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) Framework to Government Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs), excluding those in the Base Layer, effective from October 1, 2024.
Get latest updates on Income Tax Rules (24th Amendment) in 2023, including changes related to foreign companies, PAN, and document requirements.
Read the latest insights from Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, Chairman of CBIC, including highlights from the 52nd GST Council meeting and commendable fieldwork achievements.
CESTAT Chandigarh quashes allegations of clandestine removal of chemicals without excise duty payment, emphasizing the importance of expert evidence.
CESTAT Kolkata rules that objections on the eligibility of credit cannot be raised when filing refund claims, providing relief to Infosys Technologies Ltd.
