Tax season is upon us, and if you are an individual earning income, you must be aware of the approaching Income Tax Return (ITR) filing due date of 31st July 2023. Filing your ITR is not only a legal obligation but also a responsible citizen’s duty to contribute to the nation’s growth. It is crucial to adhere to the deadline and ensure your tax affairs are in order to avoid penalties and unnecessary hassles.
This article compares Mutual Funds and Fixed Deposits from a tax perspective, highlighting the advantages of Mutual Funds in terms of tax efficiency and higher returns.
CESTAT Bangalore held that with effect from 01.03.2005 branded jewellery are chargeable to excise duty @2%. However, extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in absence of establishment of allegation of wilful suppression with intent to evade payment of duty.
This article examines the tenability of levy of interest u/s 234B in cases of excess refund claimed by taxpayers under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
NCLT Mumbai held that the Resolution Plan submitted by Univastu India Ltd. which was approved unanimously by the members of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and which meets the requirements of law deserved to be approved.
Bombay High Court held that after the recognition of the first charge of the assessee as a secured creditor, the charge of the Sales Tax Department to recover the sales tax dues would be valid.
NCLT Delhi subject to the observations, approved the Resolution Plan in respect of Arena Superstructures Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) as the Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC with 71.11% of the members voting and is in accordance with the law.
In the case of Jayant vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court clarifies a magistrate’s powers in handling offences under the MMDR Act and the IPC, allowing partial appeal by the violators.
In the case of Smt. Aruna Tiwari Vs. PCIT, the ITAT Raipur ruled that a non-est assessment order cannot be revised by the CIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
Bombay High Court held that the amount of tax refunded to the Petitioner, including interest, is to be reduced while determining the amount of disputed tax under KVSS as the Petitioner had not disclosed and calculated tax properly.
