Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abharan Jewellers Vs Commissioner Of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Abharan Jewellers Vs Commissioner Of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore)

CESTAT Bangalore held that with effect from 01.03.2005 branded jewellery are chargeable to excise duty @2%. However, extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in absence of establishment of allegation of wilful suppression with intent to evade payment of duty.

Facts- The appellants in all these cases are engaged in manufacturing of articles of jewellery. With effect from 1-3-2005, excise duty was

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31