ITAT Mumbai held that the provisions of Sec. 56(2)(x) of the Act are incorporated in the Finance Act 2017 with the prospective applicability from A.Y.2017-18 and the transactions entered into prior to 1.04.2017 would not suffer any implications of the section.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that post amendment to section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, as introduced vide Finance (No.2) Act, disallowance on account of non-deduction of TDS is restriction to 30% of the expenditure as against 100%.
CESTAT Kolkata held that the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in subsequent show cause notice, where the Department has earlier issued Show Cause Notice in respect of the same subject-matter.
An overview of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in Hitesh Shantilal Mehta Vs DCIT, where the Tribunal deleted an addition by disallowance of interest expenses accrued from investments in shares and securities
Delhi High Court’s ruling on Classic Decorators’ appeal for a pre-deposit waiver against a limitation-barred service tax demand order
The objective of this paper is to analyze the developments related to the insolvency of personal guarantors to corporate debtors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Explore the GST implications on Media and Entertainment activities, including film distribution, exhibition of movies, services by artists and technicians, advertisement, and amusement parks. Understand the rates, place of supply, and impact on various components of the industry. Stay informed about GST on Online Information Database Access and Retrieval services (OIDAR) and the growth prospects of India’s media and entertainment industry.
Section 2(34) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines directors. A director is a person appointed to the board of a company. In case of a one person company, there shall be at least one director. Every public company shall have three directors and every private company shall have two directors appointed to it.
In the case of Rakhi Gautam Vs ITO (ITAT Indore), the ITAT has ordered re-adjudication due to a lack of proper hearing. Notices were sent to the registered email ID instead of physical form.
Examine the recent NCLAT Delhi verdict in the UTI Employees Sai Samruddhi Cooperative Housing Society Vs PNB Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors. case, emphasizing the significance of allowing objections in resolution plans.
