Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Benudhar Gokulanand Biswal Vs National E assessment Centre (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 202/Mum/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/05/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Benudhar Gokulanand Biswal Vs National E assessment Centre (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that the provisions of Sec. 56(2)(x) of the Act are incorporated in the Finance Act 2017 with the prospective applicability from A.Y.2017-18 and the transactions entered into prior to 1.04.2017 would not suffer any implications of the section.

Facts-The Assessing Officer (AO) has received the information that the assessee has purchased property on 14.07.2017 for a consideration of Rs.32,97,500/-, whereas the stamp valuation of the property is Rs. 52,74,186/-, therefore the AO invoked the provisions of Sec. 56(2)(x) of the Act as the assessee has failed to disclose fully material facts to the extent of Rs.19,76,686/-.

CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. Being aggrieved, assessee preferred the present appeal.

Conclusion-The provisions of Sec. 56(2)(x) of the Act are incorporated in the Finance Act 2017 with the prospective applicability from A.Y.2017-18 and the transactions entered into prior to 1.04.2017 would not suffer any implications of the section. Whereas in the present case, the transaction of purchase of flat is vide agreement dated 13.07.2009 and it was registered on 14-7-2017 in the F.Y.2018-19. Further, merely because the first payment of Rs.2 lakhs was made on 8-10-2009 subsequently after date of agreement, the revenue cannot rely on the second proviso to section 56(2)(x) of the Act and tax the difference in stamp duty value of flat as per SRO and purchase consideration as per agreement. Since the section56(2)(x) of the Act is not applicable to the assessee, as the agreement was entered prior to 1¬04-2017, hence the second proviso cannot be made applicable and the assessee cannot be fastened the liability in the light of second proviso to section 56(2)(x) of the Act. We considering the facts, circumstances, submissions, ratio of the judicial decisions set-aside the order of the CIT(A) and direct the Assessing officer to delete the addition and allow the grounds of appeal in favour of the assessee.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031