Circular No.571/8/2001-CX I am directed to say that the Board has reviewed the working of the system of fortnightly payment of duty, which was introduced in the Budget for the year 2000-2001. The figures indicate that there have been considerable defaults in payments by large number of assessees. Indeed, legal provisions have been made to discourage defaults but it is necessary that executive measures should also be taken so that such defaults do not take place at all.
Explore the Supreme Court judgment in the case of CIT Vs. Smt. Sandhya Rani Dutta, addressing pivotal questions on Hindu personal law. The ruling asserts that, according to the Dayabhaga School, a male presence is essential for the constitution of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Delve into the detailed analysis of the case, where the court examines whether female heirs can form a joint Hindu family by agreement and impress upon inherited property the character of joint family property. Gain insights into the court’s interpretation and its impact on income tax assessments for the assessees involved.
The Standard Input Output Norms appearing at Sl. No. J-258 to J-264 (under the TextileProduct Group) as amended vide the above Public Notice shall be corrected to read as under.
A number of discrepancies have since been observed by Drawback Directorate in the brand rate applications submitted by the exporters and verification reports carried out by field formations in regard to reimbursement of yarn duty against export of processed fabrics & garments.
Attention is invited to the entry at Code No.1001 of Schedule 2 Table B and S.No.12 of Appendix-1 to Schedule 2 in the book titled “ITC(HS) Classifications of Export and Import Items 1997-2002” specifying the terms and conditions for export of items indicated therein.
In exercise of powers conferred under Paragraph 4.11 of the Export and Import Policy 1997-2002, as notified in the Gazette of India extraordinary, Part-II Section 3, Sub section (ii) vide S.O. No.283(E) dated 31.03.1997, the Director General of Foreign Trade hereby makes the following amendment in Handbook (Vol 1).(RE-00), 1997-2002.
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of section 2 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) read with rule 4 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and in supersession of notification in Central Board of Excise and Customs No. 25/92-Central Excise (N.T.), dated the 9th October, 1992 published in the Gazette of India
Circular No. 570/7/2001-CX A question has been raised whether the process of drawing of wire from wire rod would amount to manufacture under section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Though duties were being paid in various centres by the units undertaking the redrawing of wire from wire rods, doubts are being raised as CEGAT in a recent order No. 85/2000-B dated 13-1-2000 in the case of M/s.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 16/2000-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2000.
The matter has been examined further and it has been decided that any ongoing open ended scheme proposing to launch additional plans, other than dividend and growth plans, which differ from the main scheme in terms of portfolio,
