Hindu personal law requires presence of a male for constitution of HUF: SC

CIT Vs. Smt. Sandhya Rani Dutta (Supreme Court)

Explore the Supreme Court judgment in the case of CIT Vs. Smt. Sandhya Rani Dutta, addressing pivotal questions on Hindu personal law. The ruling asserts that, according to the Dayabhaga School, a male presence is essential for the constitution of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Delve into the detailed analysis of the case, where the court examines whether female heirs can form a joint Hindu family by agreement and impress upon inherited property the character of joint family p

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.