Circular No. 419-Income Tax In the case of CGT v. Basant Kumar Aditya Vikram Birla [1982] 137 ITR 72 (Cal.), the karta of the assessee-HUF gave jewellery, cash and fridge of the value of Rs. 67,744 to his daughter at the time of her marriage. The assessee-HUF claimed that these were marriage expenses and did not fall within the ambit of the term “gift” as defined in section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The Calcutta High
