The Prevention of Money Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2009 (No. 21 of 2009) has come into force with effect from June 01, 2009 as notified by the Government. In terms of Sub-Section 2(a) of Section 12 of The Prevention of Money Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2009 (PMLA, 2009), the records referred to in clause (a) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 12 shall be maintained for a period of ten years from the date of transaction between the clients and the banking company and in terms of Sub-Section 2(b) of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the records referred to in clause (c) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 12 shall be maintained for a period of ten years from the date of cessation of transaction between the clients and the banking company.
(i) in regulation 1 6L, in sub-regulation (2), in the proviso, after the words for a period extending upto one year and before the words from the date of commencement of, the words and six months shall be inserted; (ii) in regulation 1 6P, after sub-regulation (2), the following sub-regulation shall be inserted, namely:- (3) A trading or clearing member of any other derivatives segment, who has been allowed to trade or clear in the currency derivatives segment, shall be liable for fees as provided in sub-regulation (1).
The principal notification No.21/2002-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2002, was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 118(E), dated the 1st March, 2002 and was last amended by notification No. 118/2009-Customs, dated the 14th October, 2009 which was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R.751(E), dated the 14th October, 2009.
(a) The subject goods had been exported to India from the subject countries below their normal value; (b) The domestic industry had suffered material injury; (c) The injury had been caused by the dumped imports from subject countries.and had recommended the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the subject goods originating in, or exported, from the subject countries;
Notification No. 82/2009 – Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by the fourth proviso to sub-section (1) of section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby empowers all the Additional Directors of Income-tax and Joint Directors of Income-tax working under the Director General of Income-tax (Investigation)
In the said notification, in the opening paragraph, in condition (vii), for the words and brackets “Waluj (Aurangabad)”,the words, brackets and punctuations “Waluj (Aurangabad), Talegoan(District Pune), Dhannad Rau (District Indore), Kheda (Pithampur, District Dhar) and Patli (Gurgaon)”, shall be substituted.
Provided that in case of American Depository Receipts or Global Depository Receipts entitling the holder thereof to exercise voting rights in excess of percentage specified in regulation 10 or regulation 11, on the shares underlying such depository receipts, public announcement shall be made within four working days of acquisition of such depository receipts.
The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), number S.O. 1800(E) dated 21st July, 2009.
In suppression of the Government Notification, Finance Department, No.VAT-1507/ CR-41/ Taxation-1, dated the 25th June 2007, the Government of Maharashtra hereby provides for grant of refund of the tax, collected by any registered dealer on his sales made to the diplomatic authorities and international bodies or organisations mentioned in column (2) of the Schedule appended hereto, subject to the conditions specified against each of them in column (3) of the said Schedule:—
the Director General (Safeguards) in its final findings vide number G.S.R.725(E), dated the 6th October, 2009, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), dated the 6th October, 2009 had come to the conclusion that increased imports of Soda Ash into India from the People”s Republic of China had caused and threatened to cause market disruption to the domestic industry of Soda Ash and it necessitated the imposition of definitive safeguard duty on imports of Soda Ash into India from People”s Republic of China
