RPCD.CO RCB.BC.No. 73/07.38.03/2010-11 It may be noted that initially transactions relating to securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and those relating to mortgage by deposit of title deeds to secure any loan or advances granted by banks and financial institutions, as defined under the SARFAESI Act, are to be registered in the Central Registry. The records maintained by the Central Registry will be available for search by any lender or any other person desirous of dealing with the property. Availability of such records would prevent frauds involving multiple lending against the security of same property as well as fraudulent sale of property without disclosing the security interest over such property. It may be noted that under the provisions of Section 23 of the SARFAESI Act, particulars of any charge creating security interest over property is required to be filed with the Registry within 30 days from the date of creation.
1, (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms ( Amendment ) Rules 2011. (2) They shall come into force with effect from 29th May, 2011. 2. In the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms, 1956, in Annexure ‘A’ for Form 23D the following Form shall be substituted , namely
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 642 read with section 610B of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms, 1956, namely : – 1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms ( Amendment ) Rules 2011.(2) They shall come into force with effect from 29th May, 2011.
Notification No. 27/2011 – Income Tax [F. NO. 149/122/2010-SO(TPL)], DATED 26-5-2011 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely :— 1. (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2011.
DBOD. Dir.BC. 96 /13.03.00/2010-11 The matter regarding extending of finance for subscription to the IDRs and loans thereagainst has been examined. It has been decided that no bank should grant any loan/advance for subscription to IDRs. Further, no bank should grant any loan/advance against security/collateral of IDRs issued in India.
Notification No. 42 /2011-Customs , New Delhi dated the 25th May, 2011 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 51/2008-Customs, dated the 21st April, 2008 which was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 297 (E), dated the 21st April, 2008, namely:–
Notification No. 41/2011-Customs, Whereas, in the matter of import of Vitrified Porcelain Tiles, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘subject goods’), falling under Chapter 69 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Customs Tariff Act’) and originating in, or exported from the People’s Republic of China (China PR) and United Arab Emirates (hereinafter referred to as the ‘subject countries’), the designated authority, vide its final findings in notification No.37/1/2001-DGAD dated 4th February, 2003 in the original anti-dumping case published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 4th February, 2003 had come to the conclusion that—
IDMD.PCD.No. 5053 /14.03.04/2010-11 As indicated in paragraph 113 of the Second Quarter Review of Monetary Policy for year 2009-10, an Internal Group was constituted by the Reserve Bank to finalise the operational framework for the introduction of plain vanilla OTC single-name CDS for corporate bonds in India.
After removing requirement of approaching Central Government for Managerial Remuneration by Public Companies which are not subsidiaries of Listed Company, MCA has further simplified the requirements of Schedule XIII. MCA has allowed the subsidiaries of Listed Companies to fix managerial remuneration subject to following conditions and has dispensed with requirements of Central Government approval: The Remuneration Committee and Board of Directors of Holding Company approve the remuneration and the said remuneration is considered as remuneration paid under Section 198 by the Holding Company;
Central Government specifies LLP as a body corporate for the limited purpose of section 226 (3) (a) which deals with appointment of auditors vide notification dated 23.05.2011.The notification given clarifies that LLP will not be treated as body corporate for the purpose of f section 226(3)(a) of the Companies Act 1956 which is related to appointment of statutory auditor and put restriction on appointment of body Corporate as statutory auditor. The circular paves the way for appointment of LLP as statutory auditor of the company. It is to be noted that MCA has already allowed the CA/CS/CWA to practice under LLP in partnership with other fellow members of same institute and in case of CS, also with members of such recognized profession as may be prescribed.
