Follow Us:

Notifications/Circulars

SEBI : Views of SEs on Reverse Mergers

June 5, 1996 1027 Views 0 comment Print

There may as well be some other implications regarding the listing of such companies and hence, we would like to have the views of all the recognised stock exchanges in the matter.

Circular No. 221/55/96-Central Excise, Dated: 04.06.1996

June 4, 1996 538 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 221/55/96-CX Consolidated maintenance of RG-23A Part II is permitted where the inputs used are common in the manufacture of dutiable and exempted final product. However, the assessee is required to submit a statement giving details of the inputs used and the quantity of the exempted and dutiable final product manufactured, thereof alongwith credit availment/ reversal particulars at the end of the every month.

Cash refund of the accumulated Modvat credit – Regarding

June 4, 1996 925 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 220/54/96-CX It has been represented that the Central Excise authorities are not sanctioning cash refunds of the accumulated Modvat credit under the provisions of rules 57F (4) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. As a consequence, large sums of money are lying tied-up in the accumulated Modvat credit account with exporters running into crores of Rupee.

Denial of Modvat credit on duty paid inputs owing to the variation of classification upto six-digit level- Regarding

June 4, 1996 433 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 219/53/96-CX Under the provisions of rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 any manufacturer of the excisable goods intending to avail of the credit of duty paid on inputs of the excisable goods intending to avail of the credit of duty paid on inputs in required to file a declaration in the prescribed form giving complete description of the inputs and the final product that he intends to manufacture

Transit Sale – Movement of goods under rule 52A invoice- Regarding

June 4, 1996 1174 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 218/52/96-CX The Board vide its Circular No. 96/7/96- CX dated 13.2.1996 clarified that under the heading “Transit sale” movement of goods could take place directly on a Rule 52 A invoice from the manufacturer”s premises to the user”s premises on an order being placed by the dealer of excisable goods without being brought to the latter”s premises. The duplicate copy of the manufacturer”s invoice issued under the provisions of Rule 52A will serve as a cover for transport and for availment of Modvat credit.

SEBI : Payment of SEBI Registration fees by members of the Exchange

June 4, 1996 1513 Views 0 comment Print

You may like to bring to the notice of members that non-payment of requisite fee in time will attract penal provision as prescribed under SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Rules and Regulations, 1992.

Circular No. 218/52/96-Central Excise, Dated: 04.06.1996

June 4, 1996 1837 Views 0 comment Print

Transit Sale – Movement of goods under rule 52A invoice- Regarding. The Board vide its Circular No. 96/7/96- CX dated 13.2.1996 clarified that under the heading ‘Transit sale’ movement of goods could take place directly on a Rule 52 A invoice from the manufacturer’s premises to the user’s premises on an order being placed by the dealer of excisable goods without being brought to the latter’s premises.

Notification No. S.O.379(E)-Income Tax Dated 30/5/1996

May 30, 1996 591 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. S.O.379(E)-Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 139A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Board hereby specifies that every person who is assessed or liable to be assessed by the Assessing Officer falling under the control of the income-tax authorities mentioned in the Table below

Circular No. 215/49/96-Central Excise, Dated: 27.05.1996

May 27, 1996 724 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 215/49/96-CX The matter regarding inclusion of notional interest on advances/ deposits in the assessable value of excisable goods have been re-examined in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Metal Box India Ltd. v. CCE Madras (1995(75) ELT 49 (SC) and the Madras High Court decision in the case of UOI & Others – V. Lakshmi machines Works Ltd. (1996(62) ECR 265 (Mad)).

Circular No. 30/96- Custom Duty Dated 24/5/1996

May 24, 1996 544 Views 0 comment Print

Kindly refer to Drawback / PN-1 / 96, dated the 27th February, 1996, announcing the All Industry rates of Drawback in respect of Cotton Handloom Terry Towels and Terry Towelling Cloth, when dyed, falling under SS No.5803 & 6309 (OId 2610 & 2710) of the existing Duty Drawback Table, as under :

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930